UPSCGeeks logo
Indian Polity
Supreme Court
Judicial Review
Collegium

The Supreme Court & Judicial Review

Updated 1 July 20264 min read

The apex court of India — its composition, the collegium system, jurisdiction, judicial review, and Public Interest Litigation (PIL). Includes the appointment flowchart.

Key Takeaways

  • The Supreme Court (Articles 124–147) is the guardian of the Constitution and the final court of appeal.
  • Judges are appointed by the President through the collegium system, evolved via the Three Judges Cases.
  • Judicial review — the power to test the constitutionality of laws — flows from Articles 13, 32 and 226.
Art 124–147
The Supreme Court
34
Sanctioned judges (incl. CJI)
65 yrs
Retirement age
Art 32
Writ jurisdiction

Core concept

The Supreme Court is the highest judicial forum and the final interpreter of the Constitution. It is the guardian of Fundamental Rights (Article 32) and enforces the rule of law through judicial review — the power to strike down laws and executive actions that violate the Constitution.

Static foundation

  • Composition: the Chief Justice of India and up to 33 other judges (sanctioned strength 34).
  • Qualifications (Art 124): a citizen who has been a High Court judge for 5 years, or a High Court advocate for 10 years, or is, in the President's opinion, a distinguished jurist.
  • Tenure: holds office until 65 years. Removal is by the process under Article 124(4) — 'proved misbehaviour or incapacity'.
  • Jurisdiction: original (Art 131), writ (Art 32), appellate (Art 132–134), advisory (Art 143); it is a court of record (Art 129).

Appointment of Supreme Court Judges (Collegium System)

1

Collegium recommends

The collegium — the CJI plus the four senior-most SC judges — recommends names for appointment or elevation.

2

Sent to the Government

The recommendation goes to the Union Law Ministry and then to the President.

3

Government may return once

The government can seek reconsideration, but if the collegium REITERATES the name, the government is bound to appoint.

4

President appoints

The President formally issues the warrant of appointment.

The collegium is not mentioned in the Constitution — it evolved through the Three Judges Cases (1981, 1993, 1998).

Evolution of Judicial Appointments

  1. 1981

    First Judges Case

    Gave primacy to the executive in appointments ('consultation' ≠ 'concurrence').

  2. 1993

    Second Judges Case

    Introduced the collegium; gave primacy to the CJI's opinion.

  3. 1998

    Third Judges Case

    Expanded the collegium to the CJI + four senior-most judges.

  4. 2014

    99th Amendment (NJAC)

    Sought to replace the collegium with a National Judicial Appointments Commission.

  5. 2015

    Fourth Judges Case

    SC struck down the NJAC as violating the independence of the judiciary (basic structure).

Jurisdictions of the Supreme Court

Tap each card to reveal what the jurisdiction covers.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL)

PIL relaxed the rule of locus standi — any public-spirited person can approach the court for those unable to do so themselves. Pioneered by Justices P. N. Bhagwati and V. R. Krishna Iyer. It democratised access to justice but also raised concerns of 'frivolous' litigation and judicial overreach.

Current affairs linkage

The collegium vs government friction over appointments and delays in clearing names is a recurring theme, as are debates on judicial vacancies, pendency, and transparency. (Add the latest data on pendency/vacancies or any recent standoff over collegium recommendations.)

Mains answer skeleton

Intro: Independent judiciary as a pillar of the basic structure.

Body: (a) Judicial review as a check on the other organs; (b) collegium — merits (independence) vs criticism (opacity, nepotism); (c) NJAC verdict and the accountability gap; (d) judicial overreach vs restraint.

Way forward / Conclusion: A transparent Memorandum of Procedure + self-restraint + filling vacancies.

Prelims trap zones

  1. Advisory jurisdiction (Art 143) opinions are NOT binding on the President.
  2. The collegium finds no mention in the Constitution — it is judge-made.
  3. Judges are removed by a process under Article 124(4); the Constitution uses the term 'removal', not 'impeachment' (which applies to the President).

Prelims Pointers

  • The SC collegium = the Chief Justice of India + the four senior-most judges.
  • The NJAC (99th Amendment, 2014) was struck down in 2015 for violating the independence of the judiciary.
  • A judge can be removed only for 'proved misbehaviour or incapacity' by a special majority in each House.
  • Advisory jurisdiction is under Article 143; the SC is a 'court of record' under Article 129.

Mains Angle

  • 'Judicial review is a basic feature, but judicial overreach threatens the separation of powers.' Discuss.
  • Evaluate the collegium system versus the NJAC in ensuring judicial independence and accountability.

Practice this topic

Browse all Indian Polity MCQs →

Ready for Mains? Write a full answer on this topic and get it graded by our AI examiner.

Write an answer

Previous

Parliament & How a Bill Becomes Law

Next

Federalism & Centre–State Relations

Related topics

Making of the Constitution: The Constituent Assembly

How India's Constitution was framed — the Constituent Assembly, the Drafting Committee under Dr. Ambedkar, key dates, and the sources of borrowed provisions.

Preamble of the Indian Constitution

The Preamble is the introductory statement of the Constitution — its philosophy, source of authority, and objectives. Understand its keywords, amendability, and landmark cases.

Citizenship (Articles 5–11)

India's single citizenship — the constitutional provisions (Articles 5–11), how citizenship is acquired and lost under the Citizenship Act, 1955, and OCI status.

Fundamental Rights (Articles 12–35)

A complete, interactive lesson on Fundamental Rights — the six categories, article-by-article deep dive, the five writs, landmark cases, and a knowledge check.